【龙腾网】有关黑暗森林理论的讨论，可怕的科学理论(7)

And that’s with a laser which has the tightest beam we can make. Large antennas and telescopes are far, far worse when it comes to sending out a tight signal.
这也不是真的。自由空间中的传播受量子物理定律的制约。我们甚至不能将地球表面的激光瞄准到月球上比足球场还小的地方上去。在整个太阳系，它将是强烈的。但是在恒星之间它会衰减到在宇宙背景辐射下看不见的程度。
这还是用我们能制造出的光束最密集的激光。大型天线和望远镜发出的信号则要差得多。
Mike Johnson
Most likely others quickly lose interest in traveling through space. I mean can you imagine how awesome video games will be in 1000 years? Also, genetic and cyber enhancements will make you immortal… why blast myself through space in a can for thousands of years to some inhospitable place when i am living in Valhalla?
很可能其他文明很快就会对太空旅行失去兴趣。你能想象1000年后的电子游戏会有多棒吗？还有，基因和网络的增强会让你长生不老……当我住在瓦尔哈拉的时候，为什么要跑到太空中，前往某个不适宜居住的地方呢？
Mike Johnson
Well it would be alot easier to seed the cosmos with sperm/egg/robot teachers than sending full grown humans….i guess
用精子、卵子和机器人老师在宇宙中播种要比用成年人类去播种要容易得多……我猜是这样的
Tom Hammer
we cannot assume other beings would automatically want to explore just because we do.
我们不能仅仅因为我们想探索，就假设其他生物会自动地想探索。
Paul Edward Montador
As Sir Edmund Hilary said about climbing Everest “I did it because it was there” Kind of the same theory Robert Williscroft has I suspect!!